Life is Belief & Struggle - Ahmed Shawqi

Tuesday, February 20, 2018

Patrick Brown is just like Herpes, just when you think relief is at hand, it flares up again.

I have to admit, Patrick Brown, creeps me out and always did.  I had an instinctual visceral dislike of the man.  My first reaction was to his election to the provincial conservative candidate was Jesus Christ, not again.  Nobody can pick losers like the Ontario Tories.   This is why the Liberals keep winning elections but the Ontario Tory brain trust just haven’t figured that out yet.   

Watching the post election behavior of Patrick Brown just left me with a bad taste in my mouth. And that people’s guarantee nonsense. Let me point it this way, if you will stab a third of your base in the back; why wouldn’t you stab me?  I admit, as long as Brown was the Tory leader I wasn’t voting for him. It is not that I wanted another Wynne term but what was the alternative? You need to give me a reason to vote and I admit I was willing to sit out this election until… the ‘sex’ scandal broke.

I admit I was shocked as I really thought Brown was the most likely candidate to come out of the closet a la Jim McGreevy style with a full court press.  Allegedly plying young women with alcohol in order to have sex with them definitely fit the Brown vibe I was feeling and was/is totally believable.  Not illegal, but nonetheless, it is still morally reprehensible behaviour.

You would have thought that Brown would have figured it out - since the Tories have been ‘leaderless’ they are now  way, way ahead in the polls, but no, he keeps coming back.  Party membership scandal, Rick Dykstra scandal, allegedly selling riding nominations, and now this. His party doesn’t want him, the voters of this province sure as hell never wanted him, but he keeps coming back. 

Just like herpes. 

I will be willing to vote for Christine Elliott or even Doug Ford since neither candidate can be worse than Wynne, but not Mulroney.  One Mulroney is more than enough for any country, and hell no for Patrick Brown.  

In fact, now I am motivated to vote against both Wynne and potentially Brown.  If I have to I will mark an  ‘X’ for Andrea Horwath and then go live in the backwoods of New Brunswick with my mother. And trust me, living with my mother, that's desperate.

Monday, October 23, 2017

Loblaw joins the ranks of Corporate Job Churners

Did you catch the latest employment news this week for Canada?  Loblaw’s is laying off 500 Office workers but no worries since Loblaw’s intends to hire even more workers in the coming year than it is laying off today – yeah, really. CBC

Loblaw Companies Ltd. has begun laying off 500 people from offices across the country, even as the company says it plans to add jobs later this year.

"As part of a broad cost-control effort we have begun eliminating corporate office roles, including various executives, members of management and colleagues at all levels," spokesperson Kevin Groh said in a statement, adding that the move will have "no effect on hourly store jobs." …

"We will continue to invest and we will be a net job creator again this year," Groh said.

What annoys me is how those who are opponents of raising the minimum wage in Ontario use this type of corporate action to beat supporters who favour the coming rise in minimum wages, but it’s a twig and not a cudgel.  These were office workers and not minimum wage retail workers; they have skills and experience and probably make well over the minimum wage and who were received benefits and corporate pensions contributions. 

And ironically, no one has questioned Loblaw’s - as to how it is possible to be a ‘net job creator’  (for this year no less) – if they are laying off 500 skilled and experienced employees in the here and now.  In the past, when you saw thousands or hundreds of workers laid off you saw a company that was significantly downgrading their operations but Loblaw’s isn’t doing that. No one keeps 500 superfluous office workers  hanging around  without work – well, all except Loblaw’s - if they are to be believed.  If  I was a young and hungry litigator starting out I would be using social media to reach out to many of those laid off workers who were in striking distance of ‘retirement’ age. But I digress. 

On the face of it, the Loblaw’s announcement defies logic. 

That is, unless you take a detailed look at current Canadian corporate employment strategy.  Offshore as much of your operation to overseas workers and for those positions which cannot be off-shored; hire local contract temporary workers from a temporary agency.  In fact, it is far cheaper to hire contract temporary workers and pay an agency fee than to hire permanent workers.  Companies have no holiday pay, benefits or pension benefits to pay out with contract temporary workers and there are no time limits beyond the ‘contract’ period which can be renewed indefinitely and at the same rate.  Also, it is the temporary agency which assumes the majority of liability for workman’s compensation should a claim arise – a not so inconsiderable cost saving.

It’s win-win for situation for all corporate companies operating in Canada, and they are all doing it.  From manufacturing to fisheries, to insurance and banking, communication companies to grocers. Our labour laws are so woefully out of date to protect Canadian workers from our homegrown Crony capitalists who literally do nothing but lay awake at night coming up with new ways to game the system. 

And if you think anyone in the professional political class will protect you one day from the widespread corporate exploitation of Canadian workers, think again. The Conservative party is the party of Crony Capitalism, and has fine tuned crafting laws to help ease off-shoring and the rise of temporary agencies.  The Greens are too busy policing what is in your garbage can and what light bulbs you use. The NDP is too busy fighting the last millennium issues or promoting ‘open borders’ and economic rights of migrants regardless of how it depresses wages for millions of ordinary working class Canadians. And the Liberals, well Moneybags Morneau even went so far as to warn young workers to get use to the new ‘reality’.
Welcome to the new Feudal age. 

Wednesday, December 28, 2016

Judith and Holofernes

One of my favourite old master painters is Artemisia Gentileschi – an Italian Baroque painter (circa 1600’s). She had a colourful life, and since the rise of the feminist movement and the search for ‘women’ artists - there is a renewed interest in her work. 

While the modern Feminism movement might have brought Artemisia to my attention; it is her use of light to create a sense of movement in her paintings and her portrayal of women in her paintings that held my attention. 

 Artemisia’s women are all womanly flesh, bone and blood. There is a complexity and a haunting realism in her women that I often find missing in other old masters.  All of which brings me in this Chanukah season to a common theme of Judith and Holofernes.

There are two common ways Judith is protrayed in old master’s paintings. Judith will be painted with almost a man’s body with the breasts tacked on as a bit of an after thought. She will often possession the demure of some kind of shrinking violet with the face of innocence and purity which all leaves the suggestion; Judith is really incapable of killing a mouse.

Artemisia was heavily influenced by Caravaggio but I believe she surpassed his talent.

This is Caravaggio’s Judith beheading Holofernes. Notice how Caravaggio’s Judith looks so young and naive, hardly capable of coming up with a plan of action to behead a man to win a war; let alone have the wherewithal to carry it out.

Caravaggio’s Judith looks horrified by the act she is in the midst of committing.  And it is Judith’s elderly maid who is the sinister one here. Judith’s elderly servant is painted to as a foil to Judith’s youthful innocence.  The servant acts as a kind of evil crone to egg on Judith to behead Holofernes.

Contrast this with the strength and resolve of Artemisia's Judith. This is a woman who can make a war plan and has the wherewithal to see it carried out to victory.

The Chanukah Stores we tell ourselves.

 Chanukah has never been a favourite holiday of mine.   It’s a minor holiday and not the most festive of our holidays. As a child the only ‘gift’ I received was chocolate coins. The presents thingies had more to do with Reform Jews attempting to complete with Christmas. The only requirement is to light a hanukkiyah  (8 branched menorah) rather than standard 6 branched menorah and custom dictates you  eat dairy products and fried food.   

 Of course, if you count the candle holders on a hannikyah, there are 9 and 7 on a standard menorah.  We don’t count the candle holder which is usually raised slightly higher than the rest. This we call the shamash and is known as the helper/guardian/ servant candle holder.  We light the shamash, and use then use the flame from the shamash to light the other candles. Since the role of the shamash is to help it does not get counted as a light against the darkness.     

This particularity oddity of not counting the obvious has a long tradition in Judaism. 

For example, every day we recite the Amidah or standing prayer as part of our daily liturgy.  The Amidah comes from the Tannaim period (10-220 CE) mostly before the destruction of the Temple with some minor fine tuning after the destruction of the temple. An important component in the Amidah is the reciting of the Shomneh Esreh – or 18 blessings, except well, there are actually 19 blessings.  This of course, does not hinder us from referring to this part of the Amidah as the 18 blessings.  My favourite part of the Shomneh Esreh is always reciting the the Birkat HaMinim; concerning the plea to punish the heretics, slanders and informers against the Jews.  Frankly, I was pleasantly surprised to discover my conservative shul still uses it, but then again, our weekday siddur is an Artscroll - Ashkenazi  one.

Then  are 613 mitzvot (laws) that are to govern a Jew’s life, except depending on what you are counting, there could be 634 more or less, but tradition dictates we refer to the group collectively as the 613 mitzvot of Moses.   

All this leads me to my favourite Chanukah story which really isn’t a Chanukah story at all since it had nothing to do with the Maccabeen victory,  and happen long before said Maccabee victory, but we only tell it at Chanukah.  There is even an Ashknenazi custom for the women of the home to do no work in honour of Judith’s bravery for a half hour after lighting the hanukkiyah.  We even have special hanukkiyah that depict Judith holding Holofernes’ sword in one hand, and in his head in the other. 

The short  version of the story is that the town of Bethalia was being siege by the Assyrian General Holofernes. Judith, a young beautiful widow, of the town came up with an idea of going to the General’s headquarters and plying him with salty cheese and wine in his tent. Her beauty she used to induce him to take her into his tent alone -  without guards. The salty cheese Judith brought was used to make him drink more of the potent wine, and the role of the potent wine was for him to pass out quickly from the drink.  
After Holofernes passes out drunk, Judith picks up his sword, and cuts off his head. She calmly walked back to the town with the general’s head concealed in her basket to show to the town’s people.  Once the general’s troops discovered his headless corpse in a tent most ran away and those who stayed, were slaughtered by the townspeople of Bethalia who were now emboldened by Judith’s actions.

But this Chanukah is special to me. This year, my daughter, the Last Amazon, will be in Ha’aretz Yisrael for the first time.  She’s wanted to go since she was 9 years old. We were supposed to go so many times but something always came up; a death, a war, university, being broke. This time, she’s on Taglit (Birthright) which in this particular case, turns out to be more reliable than Ima. Although, if she likes it. I promised her a wine tour...